Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islam. Show all posts

Thursday, September 20, 2018

DOES THE BIBLE USE THE WORD MUSLIM?

Religion, Bible,Does the Bible use the word Muslim?,Luke 6:40,Bible Luke, Islam, Religion sucks,
This post is presented to refute the gross misuse of Luke 6:40 by Muslims who claim that verse uses the term Muslim when translated upon translation of another translation.

Once again, we have desperate Muslims performing linguistic gymnastics in an attempt to misrepresent the etymology of a specific word. Here we find Muslims citing Luke 6:40 as if it says the word Muslim. Apparently, Muslims don't see the fallacious aspect of their argument when making a claim that a specific word is the same based on similar sounds these words make? A rat must be a cat, and house a mouse because they sound similar?

Folks, please keep in mind that the Injil (Gospels) was first written in Greek, not in Hebrew or Aramaic, nor in Arabic.

Here is Luke 6:40, "The disciple is not above his master; but everyone that is perfect shall be as his master."

The Greek word that Muslims are jumping through hoops to perform their linguistic gymnastics is "katertismenos" derived from the word "katardidzo" according to the Greek lexicon. The following is how this word is rendered according to the Strong's Concordance as noted from Blue Letter Bible (www.blueletterbible.org):

1) to render, i.e. to fit, sound, complete
a) to mend (what has been broken or rent), to repair
i) to complete
b) to fit out, equip, put in order, arrange, adjust
i) to fit or frame for one's self, prepare
c) ethically: to strengthen, perfect, complete, make one what he ought to be

Yet, apparently, these Muslims in the midst of their linguistic gymnastics, forgot to talk with someone that knows how to speak Hebrew.

When one reads the Hebrew translation of Luke 6:40 is:

התלמיד אינו יודע יותר ממורו, אולם אם ילמד בשקידה ובחריצות יוכל להגיע לרמת ידיעותיו של המורה.

The Greek word “katērtismenos” is translated into Hebrew as “learn diligence”. Nowhere will you find the word “she’mushlam” in this verse, as this is not a proper rendering of the translation of the Greek word into Hebrew. Furthermore, even if one was to appeal to such an argument, the entire word as noted from these deceitful Muslims is she'mushlam which does not mean Muslim unless the one making such arguments purposely distorts the word to omit the "she"??? In addition, as noted by the definitions above, we find that the Greek word "katērtismenos" does not denote submission, which the 7th Century term Muslim implies. Therefore, these words carry different meanings, which means they are not the same nor did anyone in the 1st Century imply them to be a religious term associated with Islam.

Thus, this begs the question, if the so-called term "she'mushlam" means Muslim, then why was this term not used significantly elsewhere in religious texts to denote such a religion or people group? Why did it take until the 7th Century before the term was originated as Muslim in the Arabic? Why do Muslims have to appeal to a translation of a translation of a translation in an attempt to find a specific word, when the context of such a reading does not give premise to the usage of the 7th Century meaning? This is an etymological fallacy in which a reader attempts to misuse or misrepresent the original or historical meaning of a word or phrase as if it was similar to a more modern term, such as a Muslim attempting to read back a 7th Century term as if it was the same in the 1st Century.

Thereby, I challenge any Muslim to provide any ancient antiquity of evidence proving that in the 1st Century the term "she'mushlam" referred to one who submits? However, what is even more damaging is the fact the Greek word "katērtismenos" has as root καταρτίζω, which when it is translated into Arabic, it is بصيرة (baseera), meaning insight, able to see, sober or perception.

Yet, here is the final nail in the coffin of the Muslim who appeals to such an argument which is taken from their own Koran. Please keep in mind that Jesus was present on earth during the 1st Century, and His disciples were present during and after His ministry.

Surah 61:14 “O ye who believe! Be ye helpers of Allah: As said Jesus the son of Mary to the Disciples, "Who will be my helpers to (the work of) Allah?" Said the disciples, "We are Allah's helpers!" then a portion of the Children of Israel believed, and a portion disbelieved: But We gave power to those who believed, against their enemies, and they became the ones that prevailed.”

Surah 3:52 “But when Jesus became conscious of their disbelief, he cried: who will my helpers in the cause of Allah? The disciples said we will be Allah's helpers. We believe in Allah and bear thou witness that we have surrendered.”

Surah 3:55 “Behold! Allah said: "O Jesus! I will take thee and raise thee to Myself and clear thee (of the falsehoods) of those who blaspheme; I will make THOSE WHO FOLLOW THE SUPERIOR to those who reject faith, to the Day of Resurrection: Then shall ye all return unto me, and I will judge between you of the matters wherein ye dispute.”

Author: Trend Smith
Read More

Tuesday, August 28, 2018

WAS MUHAMMAD A PEDOPHILE?

Islam, Prophet Muhammad, Pedophile,Pedophile Muhammad,Was Muhammad a Pedophile?,Muhammad and Aisha,
Was Muhammad a PEDOPHILE?
Muhammad - and any 54-year-old man who has sex with a nine-year-old PREPUBESCENT little girl, for that matter - is a pedophile!

This Prophetic analogy - where Israel is depicted as a baby girl growing, developing, and coming of age - makes that point very, very clear. It states ~

“‘Then I passed by and saw you kicking about in your blood, and as you lay there in your blood I said to you, “Live!” I made you grow like a plant of the field. You grew and developed and entered PUBERTY. Your breasts had formed and your hair had grown, yet you were stark naked. “ ‘Later I passed by, and when I looked at you and saw that you were OLD ENOUGH FOR LOVE...” (Ezekiel 16:6-8)

Not only did the girl (i.e., Israel) FIRST reach PUBERTY, but it was only AFTER that point that Yahweh said that she was READY FOR LOVE.

And even when judged by the scriptures of the PAGANS Muhammad is indubitably found to be a pedophile ~

"Thus the man will be paired with the girl, who is yet a virgin, ONLY AFTER MATURING, WHEN HER BOSOM HAS FULLY DEVELOPED, And when the young man's beard is seen upon his cheek, Within the gardens and paths will she find her husband" (Atrahasis: Tablet 1).*

*Timothy J. Stephany, Enuma Elish: The Babylonian Creation Epic, 2nd ed. (Charleston, South Carolina: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2014), 69.
Read More

MUHAMMAD THE TWISTER OF HISTORICAL FACTS

Muhammad Ibn Abdullah appeared to be a member of the Islamic militant group of the Islamic militant group of the Islamic Republic of Iran. in Arabia. A few examples will explain what I mean:

1. The story of Abraham is the father of the Jewish race of Christian faith was twisted to be the Ancestor of Muhammad the Qyurash Arab through the Ishmael of the last of Abraham of whom God has no covenant. Gen 17:21, 21: 2

2. The story of Abraham was twisted to Abraham (Gen 22; 2) was twisted to Sarah the wife of Abraham (Gen 22; 2) was twisted to Ishmael and his Egyptian mother was born out of wedlock (Q2: 127) Abraham who was tried to be sacrificed on Mount Moriah is a prophet in Islam who followed his father to the valley of Mecca to build Kaaba the shrine of the polytheists which became the center of Islamic worship . Can you believe this?

3. The story of Alexander the Great, the Greek conqueror and King who conquered the world of his time, as well as the history of the two horn man was Twisted to an Islamic prophet and Messengers of Allah called Dhul-Garnain in the Quran 18: 83-86, he was said to have been sent by Allah to follow the sun till he reached the land of the setting sun to either punish them or allow them to live. Can you believe this?

4. The story of Mary the mother of Jesus from Judah who born Jesus in Bethlehem of Judea in a manger was twisted to be Meriam the sister of Aaron the brother of Moses from the tribe of Levi who gave birth to Jesus ) - (he probably means Esau the twin brother of Jacob who is Isa in Arabic) under a Palm tree. (Q19: 23-28) Can you believe this?

5. The story of Jesus Christ who was confirmed crucified by Roman soldiers dead and buried but rose again after three days and ascended to heaven after forty days of appearing to his disciples and giving him much assurance of his resurrected life and gave him his last command (Q4: 157.) Can you believe this? I did not have any problems.

6. The Story of Jesus Coming back again as the kingdom of Kings and Lords of Lord (Rev 1: 8,19: 16 was twisted means Jesus only coming back to deny Christians who worship him as God burn crosses, marry and live as a Muslim and die and be buried beside the grave of Muhammad. Can you believe this? Let me stop here and wait for the Muslims response.

Author: Clement Hore
Read More

BIBLE NOT THE BIBLE MENTIONED IN QURAN

Islam, Religion, Bible in Quran, Bible not the Bible mentioned in Quran, Muhammad did not know anything about Bible, Bible and Quran, Prophet Muhammad,
Bible not the bible mentioned in Quran. So many names of books are mentioned in the Quran. And Muslims were initially very proud of their many books such as the Torah, the Injeel and the Book of Zabur, which is mentioned by the Quran.
But you know, if you ask which books are these? None of the Muslims can answer it. Because none of those books appear in their form or they cannot explain which book of Torah, Injeel, and Zabur is meant by the Quran.
Meanwhile, according to the Quran, these books were revealed by Allah or the Quranic term if given by Allah, it was called "revealed". Revelation according to the Quran is not the same as revelation according to the Christian Bible.

While the Christian Bible (there are Torah, the books of Prophets (Nevim), Other Books (Ketuvim), and the books of Apostles. Everything was written by the prophets and the Apostles, unlike the Quran, that the books were given directly by Allah. For example, the book of Isaiah was written by the prophet Isaiah. The Book of Peter was written by the apostle Peter. Jesus was never given or learned from the book or wrote a book. In the Quran (Q. 19:30), the Injeel was given by Allah directly to Isa. (According to the Quran, the Book of Injeel and the Torah are separated). Generally speaking, the Christian INJEEL was written by PROPHETS and APOSTLES.
So based on the way in which the book came from, it is clear that the Torah, the Gospel, and the Zabur that the Qur'an refers to, are not the books that guide Christians.
Thus, where are the books mentioned in the Qur'an? Is there a Quran lying?
Now let's read QS. 4 An-Nisaa: 163.
"We have inspired you, as We had inspired Noah and the prophets after him. And We inspired Abraham, and Ishmael, and Isaac, and Jacob, and the Patriarchs, and Jesus, and Job, and Jonah, and Aaron, and Solomon. And We gave David the Psalms."

This means that each of the prophets obtained a book from God. And of course, the same question is: where is the book? Hidden? Who is hiding? What for?
And lastly, the Quran (Qur'an 87: 18-19) also mentions that eternal life is in the earlier books of Moses and the Book of Abraham. This is also a question, do Muslims know, where are the books? Are Muslims not interested in Eternal life? Could it be that Allah Muhammad in the Quran lied?
If the Quran correctly contains the words of Allah why did Allah tell the book to read but did not tell where the books were?
If Muslim brothers cannot answer where the books are, this means you fail to maintain that the QURAN IS THE WORD OF GOD.

If the existence of the books cannot be explained, this also means that 24 prophets before Muhammad were mentioned in the Quran, only a Quranic tale originating from the illusion of Muhammad who cheated on the Bible. And obviously, Muhammad did not know anything about the books of the Torah, the Bible, the Psalms, the Book of Abraham and the other prophets' books.

Author: Rani Adiati
Read More

Wednesday, August 22, 2018

MUSLIMS ARE WORSHIPING MUHAMMAD

Islam, Religion, Muslims are worshiping Muhammad,Worshiping Muhammad,Muhammad in Islam,Allah vs Muhammad
I find it hilarious that Muslims tell us they don't worship Muhammad. The Islamic sources (isnad) go out of their way to remind us that the creation and even Allah's throne was not made but for him.

al-Hakim in his Mustadrak, Baihaqi in Dalail an-Nubuwah, Tabarani in his Kabeer, Abu Na’eem in his Hilya and ibn Asakir in Tarikh Damishq report from Sayyiduna Ameer al-Mu’mineen 'Umar ibn al-Khattab Farooq al-A’dham (radiyallahu ta'ala anhu) that:

I won't copy paste the whole thing. But if you want the full reference here it is below. The question was possessed like below and the answer was INDEED...

QUESTION: What do the respected ‘Ulama of the religion and Shari’ah say about the hadith:
لولاك لولاك ما خلقت الأفلاك - “Law laaka law laaka maa khalaqtal aflaak”. Which book is this hadith in? Is the Prophet of Allah (sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam) the reason for the creation or not? Are there other ahadith that support this narration?

Answer: Indeed the Prophet of Allah (sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam) is the reason for the creation of Adam ‘alaihis salam and the universe. If the Prophet of Allah (sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam) was not in existence, then the ‘Arsh and Kursi, Lawh and Qalam, the Skies and the Earth, Heaven and Hell, the trees and stones and all other creatures would not exist.

And while the lafdh in question is not considered an authentic wording from the Prophet (sallallahu 'alaihi wasallam), it is, as Mullah al-Qaari said, "Though al-Saghanee says this is mawdu even so I say its meaning is saheeh (authentic) even if it is not a hadith.” Please read about Ibn Taymiyyah and his discussion of the hadith law laaka in Majma` Fataawa Ibn Taymiyyah.

Author: Dave Ivrim
Read More

Friday, August 17, 2018

CRUCIFIXION FOR MUSLIMS

Islam, Religion, Misinterpreting Koran, Crucifixion, Hadith about crucifixion, Crucifixion in Islam, How did Jesus die?, Misinterpreting Koran, Tawaffa, Sahih Bukhari, Tirmidhi, Tawaffa in hadiths,
I CHALLENGE ANY MUSLIMS TO PROVIDE A SINGLE SAHIH HADITH WERE Muhammad DENIED OR REJECTED THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS ????

Please do not cite a Tafsir which is mere commentary, but rather I want the actual authentic Sunnah of Muhammad. If you cannot find any, then the claim Jesus did not die on the cross should really be scrutinized if you as Muslim are truly seeking the truth.

Folks keep in mind that the Koran is quite clear that Jesus did die as shown in Surah 3:54-55, 5:117 and 19:33. Now let’s turn our focus on the Koran identifying the death of Jesus.

Here is how Islamic scholar Asad translated Surah 3:55 "Lo! God said: "O Jesus! Verily, I shall cause thee to die..." Here is the transliteration of Surah 3:55 "Ith qala Allahu ya AAeesainnee mutawaffeeka warafiAAuka ilayya wamutahhiruka mina allatheena...." (http://www.alim.org/…/c…/3/55/allah's-promise-to-isa-(jesus))

Here is what Asad says in his commentary note 172:

“Cf. 3:55, where God says to Jesus, "Verily, I shall cause thee to die, and shall exalt thee unto Me." The verb rafa'ahu (lit., "he raised him" or "elevated him") has always, whenever the act of raf' ("elevating") of a human being is attributed to God, the meaning of "honoring" or "exalting". Nowhere in the Qur'an is there any warrant for the popular belief that God has "taken up" Jesus bodily, in his lifetime, into heaven…..”

As noted in an article by M. A. Malek on the Islamic Research Foundation International Webpage, others also translated Surah 3:55 similarly as Asad above.

“Interestingly, in the First Edition of his translation of the Qu’ran, Yusuf Ali translated "inni muttawaffi-ka" (Q3:55) as "I will cause thee to die." A similar translation is given by many others, including George Sale, J.M. Rodwell, N. J. Dawood, Muhammad Asad, Maulana Muhammad Ali, Shaykh Muhammad Shaltut, Allama Ghulam Ahmad Parwez, and so on.

Islamic scholar Muhammad Pickthall translates Surah 3:55 as "I am gathering thee." It should be noted that the language of his translation is "scriptural" and "I am gathering thee" is the Biblical idiom for "I am causing thee to die." (A. A. Karim, member of the Editorial Board).” (Malek, 1998, “The Message,” United Islamic Association (UIA) publication, London, England [http://www.irfi.org]).

Islamic historian Al-Tabari proclaims one way of interpreting Surah 3:55 is with a literal physical death as he states, “Death (wafat) means the death of real, literal dying, that is, “I am causing you to die literally.” (Abu Jaf’ar Muhammad ibn Jarir Al-Tabari, Tafsir al-Tabari: Jami’ al-Bayan ‘an Ta’wil Ay al-Quran, Salah Abd al-Fattah al-Khalidi (ed.) Damascus: Dar al-Qalam, 1997.)

It’s clear by his definition, that Asad agrees the phrase mutawaffeeka means “cause thee to die.” Keeping in the context of Surah 4:157-158, it should be interpreted to indicate the the Jews did not cause Jesus to die but rather it was Allah as he stated this in Surah 3:55, “innee mutaffeeka” meaning “I will cause thee to die.” Note, that Asad acknowledges the Koran does not teach that Allah took Jesus bodily; therefore Allah raised the soul of Jesus. This would imply that the soul left the body; therefore, the body is dead.

Yusuf Ali in his commentary note 4306 states this about death, “….In death we surrender our physical life, but our soul does not die; it goes back to a plane of existence in which it is more conscious of the realities of the spiritual world: "Allah takes the soul" (http://www.alim.org).

Asad - Surah 5:117 "....I bore witness to what they did as long as I dwelt in their midst; but since Thou hast caused me to die (falammatawaffaytanee)...."

Again, the words "tawaffaytani" and "mutawafeeka" are forms of the Arabic word “tawaffa”. The word “tawaffa” refers to physical death. Again we find in the hadiths regarding Surah 5:117 that the term tawaffa means to literally die.

The Arabic word "mutawaffeeka" in general terms means "cause thee to die". Ibn Abbas a companion of Muhammad stated: “Mutawaffeeka [means] ‘I’ll cause you to die’ (Mumeetuka)” (Sahih Bukhari, Kitabut Tafsir 4259, Sura al-Ma’idah).

The term mutawafeeka comes from the word “tawaffa” meaning to take something in full, or complete, and is almost always used to denote a physical death. The Arabic expression tawaffaitani (translated: take me up) is explained by Dr. Mahmud Shaltut, one of the previous presidents of Al-Azhar University: “(It) is entitled in this verse to bear the meaning of ordinary death…there is no way to interpret ‘death’ as occurring after his [Jesus] return from heaven…because the verse very clearly limits the connection of Jesus…to his own people of his own day and the connection is not with the people living at the time when he returns.” (Muslim World, xxxiv, pp. 214 ff; as quoted by Parrinder. Geoffery, Jesus in the Qur'an, pp.115-116; Sheldon Press, London, 1965.)

Here is what one Muslim indicates regarding Tawaffa, “What I discovered on checking every page of the compilations of Sahih Bukhari, Sahih Muslim, Tirmidhi, Ibn-e-Maja, Abu Dawud, Nasa’I, Darimi, Mu’atta; and Sharh-us-Sunnat etc.; was that the expression Tawaffi has been used three hundred and forty-six times, and in no single instance has it been used, either by the Holy Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) or by his companions, to mean anything other than ‘death’, or ‘taking possession of the soul’.... (Izala-e-Auham, Ruhani Khaza’in, volume 3, pp. 583-585).

Here are some examples of the use of Tawaffa in the hadiths.

Bukhari Volume 4, Book 55, Number 656
Narrated Ibn Abbas: “Allah's Apostle said, "You will be resurrected (and assembled) bare-footed, naked and uncircumcised." The Prophet then recited the Divine Verse:-- "As We began the first creation, We shall repeat it: A promise We have undertaken. Truly we shall do it." (21.104) He added, "The first to be dressed will be Abraham. Then some of my companions will take to the right and to the left. I will say: ‘My companions!’ It will be said, ‘They had been renegades since you left them.’ I will then say what the Pious Slave Jesus, the son of Mary said: ‘And I was a witness over them while I dwelt amongst them; when You did take me up (tawaffaytani), You were the Watcher over them, and You are a Witness to all things. If You punish them, they are Your slaves, and if you forgive them, You, only You are the All-Mighty the All-Wise.’" (5.117-118) Narrated Quaggas, "Those were the apostates who renegade from Islam during the Caliphate of Abu Bakr who fought them".

Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 149
Narrated by Ibn Abbas (RA): Allah’s Messenger delivered a sermon and said, “O people! You will be gathered before Allah bare-footed, naked and not circumcised.” Then (quoting Qur’an) he said: “As We began the first creation, We shall repeat it. A promise We have undertaken: Truly we shall do it.” (21.104) The Prophet then said, “The first of the human beings to be dressed on the Day of Resurrection, will be Abraham. Lo! Some men from my followers will be brought and then the angels will drive them to the left side (Hell-Fire). I will say. ‘O my Lord! They are my companions!’ Then a reply will come from Allah the Almighty, ‘You do not know what they did after you were gone.’ I will say just as the pious slave the Prophet Jesus (AS) said: “And I was a witness over them as long as I remained among them, but since Thou didst cause me to die (Tawaffaitanii), Thou hast been the Watcher over them; and Thou art Witness over all things (5.117) Then it will be said, “These people have continued to be apostates since you left them.”

Here we find that Ibn Abbas was indicating that God took Muhammad (tawaffaytani) in the same manner he took Jesus up to himself. Since we know that Muhammad was taken by death, this strongly argues that Jesus also died before ascending to God.

Author: Trent Smith
Read More

Wednesday, August 15, 2018

WHY I LEFT ISLAM?

Islam,Religion,Why i left Islam?,Why i quit Islam?,Leaving from Islam,Adam and Eve story,Religion is business,God in Islam,God in a father
I already told you I was a Muslim and now I'm an atheist who asked me a lot of people why I left faith and became an atheist and you were Muslim then this is I will tell you many reasons that made me leave faith and after a long years search I knew that religions are a human industry that started from simplicity and multi-Earth Gods and then evolved into heavenly and extinct all gods left only one machine and they will also die soon I From Iraq not only I am an atheist there are thousands of atheists from Iraq and the middle east and the number is growing rapidly and then a matter or rather drama Adam and eve and create them from mud this is a farce and contempt for saying I see it is illogical or animals Solomon and bird understand Solomon and lehman understand bird haha or a wooden ship a legend carrying all animals or man balaa whale and yqdẖfẗ after three days live or a man named Imam Mahdi think he lives to now means colony over 1200 years and still alive I think that religion is a lucrative business and then the question of God.

I want to look like God in a father who sends a mother on a trip to a certain area and says to a boy there are two roads on this trip, a temple road, a safe place with rest stations, restaurants, and lots of entertainment. His bloodline will not receive an award and will be punished. And the second way is not a safe temple that doesn't have any amenities or restaurants and the father says to the boy go this way because he will get an award and don't be The Father already knows that the boy will choose the path of the temple (the path of fire and punishment that is ending), yet he sends a mother and he has not enough. And yet he knows that the boy will be a bad end and send him and then describe himself I mean father with mercy, justice, and compassion where are all these qualities from Father's position just ask. And countless reasons don't make man realize that religions are just an idea, and then strange contradictions in a strange wonder.

Author: Konin Jack
Read More

IS THE QURAN MIRACLE OF MUHAMMAD?

Islam, Religion, Is the Quran Miracle of Muhammad,Muhammad's miracle,Satan's Islamic Allah,Is Allah not all-knowing?,Koran and Bible
Muslims, you claim the Koran is a miracle associated with Muhammad! What makes the Koran a miracle associated from Muhammad when it was Allah that said he revealed it? Keep in mind it is not a miracle to parrot what someone else was already reciting.

Muslims, let’s make this real easy. Please provide the Koran that was written by Allah, not the modern Koran that was written by unknown authors who never saw this apparent angel let alone your so-called Allah?

ANY DEVIATION FROM THE KORAN TO THE BIBLE WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF TOPIC AND PROVE YOU CANNOT REVEAL THE ORIGINAL KORAN FURTHER PROVING YOUR FALSE GOD Al-lah AS A FRAUD.

Using your same logic that you attempt to use with the Christians, the Koran is not the words of Allah but rather the words of so-called contemporaries of Muhammad. You see the Koran was supposedly handed down by an angel to Muhammad, then recited to Muhammad. These so-called recitations were then supposedly memorized, but forgotten by Muhammad and the Hafiz, but also written down on animal skins, rocks, and leaves by unknown authors. What is even more comical is the need for abrogation to try and cover up Muhammad's lies and forgetfulness. However, because of corruption, Uthman burned the Koranic manuscripts after he altered them into one document. Keep in mind this was the second collection of the written material from unknown authors supposedly into one Koran. The first came at the battle of Yamama as Abu Bakr order the Koran to be put in one because much of the Koran was being lost with the Hafiz who died and others did not know what they knew of the Koran. What is even more comical is even after the attempt to cover up Muhammad's blunder, there are still missing Surahs and of course different manuscripts than the Uthman version.

So again, please provide the Koran that your so-called Allah wrote if you are going to stay consistent with your logic and request from the Christians.

How to prove satan's Islamic Allah is false in one post.

The so-called Allah and Islamic theology claim that the Koran is eternal and written on a tablet in Jannah and that the Koran Muslims currently read is exactly the same as the one Allah wrote. This begs the following questions.

If the Koran is eternally written in heaven, then how is it the temporal koran on earth can be abrogated? Does this not presuppose that Allah's eternal Koran was continuously being abrogated as well, or the very least, Allah is not all-knowing? Additionally, since the temporal Koran was being changed, lost, missing, forgotten and burned does this not mean the so-called eternal Koran was undergoing the same since Allah would have to change the eternal Koran to match the temporal one?

Author: Trent Smith


Read More

Monday, August 13, 2018

MUSLIMS MISINTERPRET THE KORAN

Religion, Islam, Misinterpreting Koran, Is Jesus died for Quran, Jesus in Koran, Hadith about crucifixion, We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, Yusuf Ali, Does Allah say Jesus was not crucified?,
Muslims, you continue to insert conjecture with no supporting evidence from WITHIN the Koran regarding Surah 4:157-159. Your Allah makes a very bold claim in his Koran as shown below, so I wonder if he lied or you just don't know your Koran?

Here are some questions that should be answered WITHIN your Koran, if your Allah is not a false god!!!

1. How was it made to appear to the Jews that Jesus died by crucifixion (Surah 4:157)?

2. How did Jesus die as noted in Surahs 3:55, 5:117 and 19:33?

3. As noted in Surah 4:159: Everybody will believe in whom? Whose death is being referred to in this aya? Please keep in mind that many "People of the Book (Jews)" die every day without believing in Jesus, and the Christians already believe in Him as the Messiah, so who will believe in it, and believe in what?

Muslims did you know that you misinterpret your own Koran, thus proving you lack understanding of the Koranic teachings, and what your Allah is saying?

I challenge Muslims to show me a single Sahih Ahadeeth where Muhammad denies the crucifixion event? I don't want a tafsir, but an actual hadith where Muhammad is supposedly speaking!!!

Nowhere does the Koran deny that Jesus was killed or crucified wholesale, and Muslims who grossly misinterpret Surah 4:157, do so because they know that the Koran is a giant satanic contradiction.

Before determining if Jesus died, we must determine if the claim Jesus was never crucified is substantiated in the Koran itself. So the initial question then becomes, “Does Allah really say Jesus was not crucified in Surah 4:157-158?”

Yusuf Ali
That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:- Nay, Allah raised him up unto himself. Allah was ever mighty, wise.”

In Surah 4:157 who is the "They, Their and Them" that this aya is speaking of? You can read back to Surah 4:154-156 to get the context of aya 157.

From this, it is important to note, that the Koran DOES NOT deny that Jesus was crucified! Rather it denies that the Jews crucified Jesus. This matches up with the Gospel accounts as it was the Romans that crucified Jesus, not the Jews. So when aya 157 says “THEY” did not kill Him nor crucify Him, this is not a denial of the crucifixion but rather an indication of a factual historical event that the Romans themselves crucified Jesus. Additionally, when aya 157 says “it was made to appear to them (Jews) that THEY (Jews) killed Jesus, it should be noted that there are major disagreements among the Islamic scholars what this actually means. However, should this be so? Absolutely not, since the Koran is quite clear what happened to Jesus. Many translators have actually inserted words that are not found in the Arabic for Surah 4:157 as shown below.

In fact, we do find that the Koran defines the term “it appeared to the Jews that they killed Jesus”, because while they killed His body, they could not destroy the soul as taught in the Koran itself.

Secondly, the above interpretation is consistent with the Koran itself, as the following passage will demonstrate that it is Allah himself that causes the death of people.

Surah 8:17
"Ye (Muslims) slew them not, but Allah slews them. And thou (Muhammad) threwest not when thou didst throw, but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair test from Him. Lo! Allah is Hearer, Knower."

Thus Surah 4:157 does not deny the crucifixion of Jesus, but rather denies the Jews boast that they killed Jesus, as it was Allah who planned the death of Jesus by crucifixion and resurrection.

Hilali-Khan
Surah 3:54-55
"And they (disbelievers) plotted [to kill 'Iesa (Jesus)], and Allah planned too. And Allah is the Best of the planners."

3:55 - Rodwell
"Remember when God said, "O Jesus! verily I will cause thee to die, and will take thee up to myself and deliver thee from those who believe not; and I will place those who follow thee above those who believe not, until the day of resurrection. Then, to me is your return, and wherein ye differ will I decide between you."

What is even more theologically alarming for Islam is the fact that the crucifixion is only spoken of in one area in the Koran with no true context and not supported by any other Surah (outside of Surah 3:55, 5:117, and 19:33) or Sahih Hadith from Muhammad himself. In fact, this aya appears to come out of nowhere and is presented in such an ambiguous way that not even Islam's great scholars can come to an agreement on the meaning of Surah 4:157-159. However, there are a few verses in the Koran that do speak of Jesus dying, thus, the Muslims find themselves in a rock and a hard place frantically attempting to grasp onto contradictory Tafsir to justify their misconceptions and denial of the Bible’s teachings. In fact, numerous Islamic scholars do believe that Jesus was crucified, and many acknowledge that Jesus did die a physical death and they believe Surah 4:157 speak this. However, as noted above, the Jews believed they killed off Jesus, but while one dies physically, they live on eternally in the spirit. In fact Surah 3:169 alludes to this very same belief – “Think not of those who are slain in Allah's way as dead. Nay, they live, finding their sustenance in the presence of their Lord;” Yusuf Ali explains this concept in note 447 when he cites this, “A beautiful passage about the Martyrs in the cause of Truth. They are not dead: they live,-and in a far higher and deeper sense than in the life they have left. Even those who have no faith in the Hereafter honor those that die in their cause, with the crown of immortality in the minds and memories of generations unborn. But in Faith, we see a higher, truer, and less relative immortality. Perhaps "immortality" is not the right word in this connection, as it implies a continuation of this life. In their case, through the gateway of death, they enter, the true real Life, as opposed to its shadow here.”

Again we find in Surah 2:154 – Yusuf Ali, “And say not of those who are slain in the way of Allah: "They are dead." Nay, they are living though ye perceive (it) not.” Here we find that the Apostles which would include Jesus died before Muhammad.
Surah 3:144 – Asad “and Muhammad is only an apostle; all the [other apostles have passed away before him: if, then, he die or is slain, will you turn about on your heels? But he that turns about on his heels can in no wise harm God - whereas God will require all who are grateful [to Him].” We find that in Sahih Bukhari this same claim is reiterated. You will note that it does not say the Rasools have passed except Jesus son of Mary.

So clearly as we read Surah 4:157, we can see that the Injeel is clearly represented in Surah 4:157 as the body of Jesus was crucified as the perfect Lamb of God, but His Spirit is eternal and cannot die.

I CHALLENGE ANY MUSLIMS TO PROVIDE A SINGLE SAHIH HADITH WERE Muhammad DENIED OR REJECTED THE CRUCIFIXION OF JESUS???? Please do not cite a Tafsir which is mere commentary, but rather I want the actual authentic Sunnah of Muhammad. If you cannot find any, then the claim Jesus did not die on the cross should really be scrutinized if you as Muslim are truly seeking the truth.

Author: Trent Smith
Read More

Sunday, August 12, 2018

WHO IS THE FIRST MUSLIM ?

Islam, Who is the first Muslim?,RaM,First Muslim for Quran,First Muslim, Religion, Is Abraham first Muslim?,An'am,A'raf,Ali'ImranWHO IS THE FIRST MUSLIM FOR QURAN?
For An'am 163, the first Muslim is Muhammad.

For A'raf 143, the first Muslim is Moses.

For Ali'Imran 67, the first Muslim is Abraham.

An'am 163: "No partner has Him. And this I have been commanded, and I am the first [among you] of the Muslims."
The above verse states that Muhammad is the first Muslim, but it is null and void.

A'raf 143: "... Exalted are You! I have repented to You, and I am the first of the believers."
The above verse states that Moses is the first Muslim, but its also null and void.

This following verse making An'am 163 and A'raf 143 verse null and void
Ali'Imran 67: "Abraham was neither a Jew nor a Christian, but he was one inclining toward truth, a Muslim [submitting to AllŒh]. And he was not of the polytheists."

Abraham was a Muslim before them because he lived before Muhammad and Moses. There seems to be a complexity of being Muslims about prophets like Adam, Idris, Noah who lived before Abraham.

Writer: Religion and Mythology
Read More

Saturday, August 11, 2018

DOGS AND OTHER ANIMALS IN QURAN

Islam, Dogs in Islam, Islam hates, Animals in Islam, Errors in Quran, Errors in Koran, Hadiths, al-Bukhari, Angels hates the dog in Islam, Science and Islam, Religion,
I do not want to demonstrate the numerous scientific and conceptual errors of the Quran. With such a contribution, I am not going to hit your reason, but I want to dwell on another aspect of Islam: the denial of that humanity that is inherent to every man.

The concept of impurity comes from the Bible: according to the Jewish religion, animals can be classified as pure or impure (from the alimentary point of view), according to precise rules: for example you can eat every ruminant quadruped that has a divided nail from a fissure, while it is considered an abomination to eat the animals that crawl on the earth, walking on the belly or with more than two feet.

From these rules, we deduce that we should not eat pork and shellfish, but the prohibited animals are numerous, and the chosen criteria, sometimes senseless.

The Koran (2:173) excludes, in addition to blood and dead animals (which of course could be decomposing), only the pig.

Food prescriptions for certain foods may make sense: there are non-edible or potentially harmful meats, but in any case, it should be medicine, certainly not religion, to give food advice! Like humans, every animal can be a bearer of infections, particularly the pig, although today's pigs are very different from those that Muhammad knew: some breeds have percentages of fat comparable to calves, and modern food techniques should guarantee their healthiness! However, it is undoubtedly true that by consuming raw or undercooked pork, of uncertain origin, it is possible to be infected by some dangerous pests!

On the other hand, Muhammad advised milk and camel urine (an animal that he loved so much), as a miracle cure for any pathology, but the camels may be, among other things, carriers of two potentially fatal diseases: trypanosomosis (disease of sleep, also transmitted by tsetse flies) and the MERS (coronavirus Middle Eastern respiratory syndrome), identified for the first time in Saudi Arabia and Qatar, a virus for which there is still no cure or even a vaccine. The WHO attests that since 2012 there have been 2200 cases, especially in Arabia, with 790 deaths, so the syndrome has a very high mortality!

Therefore, if food bans can be quite understandable, the concept of impurities regarding animals that are generally not part of our diet takes on a very different value.

For example, as attested by some Hadiths of al-Bukhari, Muhammad has repeatedly expressed the belief that dogs are impure and unclean animals, in addition to the ridiculous assertion that they alienate angels, or are manifestations of the devil:

- Narrated `Abdullah bin `Umar:
Allah's Messenger ordered that the dogs should be killed.
Vol. 4, Book 54, Hadith 540

- Narrated Abu Talha:
I heard Allah's Messenger said: "Angels do not enter a house wherein there is a dog or a picture of a living creature”.
Vol. 4, Book 54, Hadith 448

- Narrated `Aisha:
The things which annul the prayers were mentioned before me. They said, "Prayer is annulled by a dog, a donkey and a woman (if they pass in front of the praying people)." 
Vol. 1, Book 9, Hadith 490

- Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Messenger said, "If a dog drinks from the utensil of anyone of you it is essential to wash it seven times."
Vol. 1, Book 4, Hadith 173

- It was narrated that Abu Dharr said:
“I asked the Messenger of Allah about the all-black dog and he said: ‘(It is) a devil’
Sunan Ibn Majah Vol. 4, Book 28, Hadith 3210

For about 50,000 years, since prehistoric times, man has used the dog's collaboration to protect the flocks from the aggression of wild animals or the theft of the enemy tribes. It is commonly said that the dog is "the best friend of man": this relationship now very old, started for practical needs, has turned into time, in a special bond and mutual benefit. A dog keeps company, makes the owners active, sociable and in a good mood; and the commitment it requires is offset by numerous positive aspects. Even the simple fact of having a visual contact with your dog can release in our body oxytocin, a hormone of well-being and happiness. A research has also found that those who own a dog are generally less depressed, feel less alone, have higher self-esteem and tend to suffer less than stress.

Dogs were originally descended from wolves. These animals live in packs and are intimately linked to the members of their group from what in human terms we could call loyalty. Stephen Zawistowski, a scientific advisor, states that dogs see the humans they live with, as members of their "herd", and therefore are ready to defend them in all circumstances.

Certainly, no one can deny the important role played by the dog in service and in union with man, on various occasions of danger and relief, and in the daily help offered to the handicapped, whether a motor, sensory or psychic. In the early 60s the American psychiatrist Boris Levinson coined the term 'pet therapy', to indicate a practice of support to other forms of traditional therapies, which exploits the positive effects given by the proximity of an animal, on children, the elderly, people with psychological or relational problems, a complex and delicate syntony that stimulates emotional activation and favors openness to new experiences, new ways of communicating, new interests.
Dogs are not only "friends" of man, they can also be their protectors. They can guide the blind in any place, save people trapped by collapses, avalanches or earthquakes, recover them at sea or in the snow. In addition, some dogs manage to predict the arrival of their master's epileptic seizure, about 15 minutes before this happens. If trained, some dogs start barking to push the patient to sit down to limit the damage of the attack.

In 2004, the neurologist Adam Kirton of Alberta Children's Hospital in Canada published the results of a study done to verify this behavior by dogs in the journal "Neurology". It seems that before an epileptic attack, the patient's body undergoes physiological changes and changes in sweating, which the dog, with its extraordinarily developed sense of smell, can detect. The sense of smell, the knowledge of the smell of one's master and the affection towards him, make the dog assume towards him an attitude of concern and protection. There are also numerous testimonies of parents of epileptic children, according to which the dogs of the house, before the crisis, began to show strange behavior, keeping the sick children away from dangers that could be fatal during the crisis, like the stairs of home.

In many countries with vast snow-covered or icy surfaces, dog-sleigh is still used as a means of locomotion, but currently, dogs are also trained to detect drugs, weapons, explosives or tobacco, working with police patrols.

On the monument standing in front of a Missouri, court is engraved as one of the most moving statements that have ever been dedicated to the boundless love of a dog. In the nineteenth century, George Graham Vest pronounced it before becoming a senator when he sponsored a neighbor whose dog had been killed by another man. When Vest concluded the final pleading, the jury took a few minutes to pronounce the verdict. The plaintiff obtained five hundred dollars of damages, even if the judge could not fulfill the wish of the jurors that the murderer of the dog ended up in jail, because then the law did not admit such a penalty.

These are the words pronounced by Senator Vest:
"... The only friend completely devoid of selfishness that a man can have in this selfish world, the only one who never abandons him, the only one who never finds himself ungrateful or unfair, is the dog. The dog remains close to the owner in prosperity and poverty, in health and in sickness. While staying at his side, he sleeps on the icy ground, when the winter winds blow and the snow falls. He kisses the hand that has no food to offer, licks the wounds and sores caused by the clash with the roughness of the world. Watch over the sleep of a poor man as if he were a prince. When all the other friends leave, he stays. When riches take flight and reputation shatters, it is just as constant in its love as the sun in the path that follows in the sky. If fate leads the master to wander the world like a pariah, without friends and homeless, the faithful dog asks for no other privilege than to accompany him, to protect him from danger and fight against his enemies, and when the final scene arrives and the death holds the master in his embrace and his body is laid in the cold earth, no matter if all the other friends will accompany him; there, near the tomb, there will be the noble dog, with his head between his paws and his eyes, but open as a sign of vigilance, faithful and sincere even in death".

There are many incredible stories, sad and wonderful at the same time, which testify to the extraordinary bond and absolute dedication that dogs feel towards their master.

One of the most famous is the story of Hachiko, the legendary Akita dog whose story, from his native country, has spread to the rest of the world. The most famous dog in Japan, came back to the fore a few years ago, thanks to the moving film version, starring Richard Gere.

Born in Odate, Hachiko, whose real name was Hachi (number eight, considered auspicious), had been adopted just two months by Hidesaburo Ueno, a professor at the University of Tokyo.
For two years the little dog accompanied the professor daily to the Shibuya district station and every day he also waited for his return from the university. But on 21 May 1925, the drama takes place. Ueno was struck down by a stroke during a lesson, suddenly dying. Hachiko, however, continued for about 10 years, to go, systematically every day, to the station around 17, the time of arrival of the train of his human companion. Its history, with the passage of time, began to spread throughout Japan becoming the living symbol of canine fidelity. In 1934, when he was still alive, a bronze statue was made in his honor, located right in the railway station that made him famous. Another statue was dedicated to Odate, his hometown, with the same dog present at the inauguration. Hachiko died on March 8, 1935, at the age of 13, a news that ended up on all the front pages of the Japanese newspapers. The dog's embalmed body was then exhibited at the Tokyo National Museum of Nature and Science, while some bones were buried next to the grave where the master rests.

Every year, on the anniversary of the death, a ceremony is held in front of the Hachiko statue to commemorate its inexhaustible devotion to the master. For 80 years since his death, the University of Tokyo wanted to remember him with another statue, this time with his owner. A moving image, waiting for 90 years.

A similar case also happened in Italy. In the winter of 1941, Carlo Soriani found a dog, a crossbreed of English Pointer, wounded in a ditch. The man brought it home and decided to adopt it, giving it the name of Fido (trusty): never name was more suitable. Once reestablished, the dog was a faithful companion of life and every morning he accompanied him from his home to the central square of Luco del Mugello, where Soriani took the bus to Borgo San Lorenzo. After seeing him leave, Fido go back home and then returned to wait for him at the bus stop every evening. On December 30, 1943, the man died under a bombing and that evening Fido waited in vain! But he did not want to surrender to reality, his affection was stronger than time and death: for 14 years, until his death in 1958, he went every day to wait for the bus. Fido carefully examined every passenger coming down from the vehicle, throwing a last disappointed and heartfelt glance at the now empty vehicle, before returning home. On November 9, 1957, the mayor of Borgo San Lorenzo gave Fido a gold medal. A bronze monument was placed shortly after the death of the animal in front of the town hall, with the dedication: "A Fido, an example of loyalty". His story was also told in a video of the Istituto Luce.
Throughout the world, dogs trained in research have saved the lives of many thousands of people, but in some circumstances even the common domestic dogs have turned into real heroes, sometimes sacrificing their lives, to protect their master. I bring only two brief examples.
On May 21, 2014, Chris Wacker was harvesting wild mushrooms in Minnesota, in the company of his dog Toby, a handsome black labrador (according to Muhammad, the black dogs would be demons) of 8 years.

Unfortunately, during the search for mushrooms, the unfortunates came across a couple of big black bears with puppies. It is known that bears, in the presence of their puppies, are particularly aggressive, driven by the instinct of protection towards offspring.

Realizing the danger, the fearless Toby tried to defend his master, barring his way to the female.
Chris, feeling unable to do anything to save his beloved dog, also saw the threat of the other large specimen, decided to escape. When he arrived at the home of his father who lived in those areas, the man was convinced he would not see his dog again, but soon Toby returned to him, despite being seriously injured. It had many fractures and lacerations, with cuts of up to 15 centimeters. Taken to a veterinary clinic, he died in Chris's arms.

A dog is willing to do anything to save the life of his master. To prove it (again) is a story with a happy ending in Michigan, starring a Golden Retriever named Kelsey and his owner Bob. In a cold evening during New Year's Eve parties, with a polar temperature, Bob went out into the garden to get wood for the fireplace, but as he lowered himself, he fell and hurt his neck and lost his senses. Kelsey, arrived to the rescue, immediately stretched out on him to repair him with the heat of his body. Meanwhile, trying to keep him awake, he continued to bark for someone to notice the accident. The neighbors noticed the accident, only after many hours, finding the dog that still protected Bob. Of his injury, he does not remember anything, but the doctor who operated it said that if Kelsey had not been to heat it, Bob would have lost his life by frostbite.

Many Muslim theologians state that the dog's saliva is considered unclean.
The hypothesis that dogs can transmit diseases to men by licking their master, derives mainly from bad information, without any proof corroborated by specific evidence. Many are convinced that by the fact that the dog can lick and eat anything that is on the ground, the man is likely to contract terrible diseases, but some studies show that the bite of a man is much more infected than that of a dog. In the saliva of the dog and the cat are in fact present enzymes, such as lysozyme, and others such as lactoferrin, lactoperoxidase, glucose-oxidase. In different chemical ways, these enzymes have a recognized antibacterial activity, and they are used to naturally disinfect the mouth, as well as having an anti-plaque action. So a dog that licks its owner (especially if they are regularly given the vaccines), can hardly transmit diseases, indeed it can transfer beneficial bacteria, which would be interpreted by our body as antibodies. The research, performed by Kim Kelly and Charles Raison, has laid out new rules regarding animal behavior. The dog's bacteria are present in its saliva, coming directly from the intestine: it would be probiotic bacteria, similar to those that we usually find in yogurt, and these antibodies would stimulate the immune response of our body.

In reality the only potentially fatal disease is given by the "Capnocytophaga canimorsus", a subtle bacterium present in the saliva of dogs and other animals that, in contact with human mucous membranes, can provoke septicemia, a general infection to the whole body. A similar case actually occurred: a seventy-year-old pensioner ended up in intensive care for a very rare form of septicemia contracted by her dog, a small greyhound. It took two weeks in intensive care (one-month hospital) and antibiotic treatment to defeat the disease. In reality, any bacterium can cause sepsis and this disease particularly affects people with an already compromised immune system.

Even the cat's saliva can provoke septicemia, but Muhammad, who adored cats (but not dogs), did not include them among the animals considered impure!

All this indicates that, like so many other things, that Muhammad made his choices according to his personal tastes, rather than logical, scientific or religious considerations, then to observe his teachings to the letter, can lead to blatant errors!

Uncritically following his absurd dictates, can generate more violence, beyond that which already spreads the world! In Vienna, Ingrid, a 54-year-old lady, accompanied by her two dogs (one of them with three legs), while she was talking to her neighbors in front of their gate, was brutally assaulted by an 18-year-old Somali girl with a veil, and thrown to the ground. Ingrid was operated twice in the Wilhelminen Hospital: her knee was split and it was necessary to replace it with an artificial implant surgically. The reason for such fury was explained by the girl's husband: "We do not want dogs, they are impure"!

The dog, impure animal? The only impure thing is the mind of people who think that a noble and generous animal like a dog can be considered as such!

Every time I meet an abandoned dog, crossing the eyes of his wet eyes, sad and melancholy, I feel a grip on my heart, if I could, I would take it with me. I limit myself when I can, to feed them. I see him walking away sadly, wandering aimlessly with his uncertain step, in search perhaps vain of a little 'food, and especially a caress that warms his heart: all he seeks is to offer his unconditional dedication to a person that knows how to welcome the great gift of his affection.

After abandoning the culture and rational thinking to follow exclusively the Qur'an, you Muslims, forced into the cage of the (often absurd) prescriptions of Sharia, have renounced some of the highest qualities of man: the ability to feel feelings for any living being and humanity that would allow you to feel empathy towards all your similar. You have chosen instead of the rage and anger against those who do not follow your faith!

Author: Remy Fani
Read More

ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE TO ISLAM

Religion, Islam, Terrorism in Islam, Islamic country, Divine bullshits, Jihad, Divine duty, Killing humans because of religion, Islam is not religion of peace,
Point to Ponder
“ANOTHER PERSPECTIVE”

  • You say, YOUR’S ‘god’ is the ONLY TRUE GOD.
  • You say, YOUR’S ‘Asmani Kitab’ is the ONLY TRUTH.
  • You Say, YOUR’S ‘Faith’ is the ONLY TRUE FAITH.
  • You say, YOUR’S FAITH bestows ‘DIVINE RIGHTS’ upon ‘YOU’ to LORD OVER THE WORLD.

THAT IS WHY, you firmly believe that it is your divine duty to make others (non-Muslims), surrender to your faith (either with your kind of logic /or by ruthless force).

TO UPHOLD “THIS FAITH OF YOURS”, FOR THE LAST 1400 YEARS OR SO:

  • You have been Killing (ruthlessly, rapping and robbing) MILLIONS & MILLIONS OF FELLOW HUMANS as a part of your divine duty.
  • You have been destroying one after another, every different CIVILIZATION ON PLANET EARTH.
  • You have been in PERPETUAL JIHAD, TO ESTABLISH YOUR OWN DIVINE RULE (SET BY THE PIOUS AND PEACEFUL IN ISLAM).

HERE IS YOUR REPORT CARD (based upon the last 1400 years or so), of your RELENTLESS JOURNEY TO FIGHT FOR YOUR OWN KIND OF TRUTH:

“Yes! you have been able to establish more than 50 exclusive Islamic Nations for the pious and peaceful (like your own selves), have been able to consolidate almost around 2 billion pious and peaceful like your own selves (devout Muslims).
And of course, you have been feeling proud of your stupendous success.

HOW ABOUT THE FOLLOWING STARK REALITIES?

  • Most of the Drug traffickers, Contact killers, Illegal money changers (Hawala operators), Criminals, racial and religious bigots, Rapists and you name it, everything in the dark world of crime……………. statistically speaking, your kind of pious and peaceful have won almost exclusive monopoly.
  • In the world of TERRORISM, you, the pious and peaceful have (unchallenged) preeminence and control over the world of crime. What if I could say, you are like THE POLAR STAR in the universe of terrorism that provides divine navigational guidance.
  • And almost all YOUR MUSLIM NATIONS are in shambles from JIHAD within and without; their economies destroyed, their once beautiful cities turned in heaps of rubble, their society and social structure in peril, and no one wish and desire to LIVE THERE (not even MUSLIMS THEMSELVES).

Would you please, EVER SHOW TO THE WORLD:
THAT LIGHTHOUSE OF YOUR FAITH built by the pious and peaceful (on any place on earth) FOR THE GUIDANCE OF NON-MUSLIM KAFFIRS TO BELIEVE IN ANYTHING YOU SAY, COMMAND AND/OR DEMAND.

Don’t you think, YOU NEED TO INTROSPECT AND REFLECT, MATURE UP AND SEEK GENUINE PSYCHIATRIC HELP?

Author: Mohinder Partap Arora
Read More

QURAN AND ALLAH

Islam, Quran, Quran contradiction, Quran and Muhammad, Religion, Is Allah false?, Is Koran eternal?, Islam contradiction, Abu bakr,
Muslims, you claim the Koran is a miracle associated with Muhammad! What makes the Koran a miracle associated from Muhammad when it was Allah that said he revealed it? Keep in mind it is not a miracle to parrot what someone else was already reciting.

Muslims, let’s make this real easy. Please provide the Koran that was written by Allah, not the modern Koran that was written by unknown authors who never saw this apparent angel let alone your so-called Allah?

ANY DEVIATION FROM THE KORAN TO THE BIBLE WILL BE CONSIDERED A CHANGE OF TOPIC AND PROVE YOU CANNOT REVEAL THE ORIGINAL KORAN FURTHER PROVING YOUR FALSE GOD Al-lah AS A FRAUD.

Using your same logic that you attempt to use with the Christians, the koran is not the words of Allah but rather the words of so-called contemporaries of Muhammad. You see the Koran was supposedly handed down by an angel to Muhammad, then recited to Muhammad. These so-called recitations were then supposedly memorized, but forgotten by Muhammad and the hafiz, but also written down on animal skins, rocks, and leaves by unknown authors. What is even more comical is the need for abrogation to try and cover up Muhammad's lies and forgetfulness. However, because of corruption, Uthman burned the Koranic manuscripts after he altered them into one document. Keep in mind this was the second collection of the written material from unknown authors supposedly into one Koran. The first came at the battle of Yamama as Abu Bakr order the Koran to be put in one because much of the Koran was being lost with the Hafiz who died and others did not know what they knew of the Koran. What is even more comical is even after the attempt to cover up Muhammad's blunder, there are still missing Surahs and of course different manuscripts than the Uthman version.

So again, please provide the Koran that your so-called Allah wrote if you are going to stay consistent with your logic and request from the Christians.

How to prove satan's Islamic Allah is false in one post.

The so-called Allah and Islamic theology claim that the Koran is eternal and written on a tablet in Jannah and that the Koran Muslims currently read is exactly the same as the one Allah wrote. This begs the following questions.

If the Koran is eternally written in heaven, then how is it the temporal koran on earth can be abrogated? Does this not presuppose that Allah's eternal Koran was continuously being abrogated as well, or the very least, Allah is not all-knowing? Additionally, since the temporal Koran was being changed, lost, missing, forgotten and burned does this not mean the so-called eternal Koran was undergoing the same since Allah would have to change the eternal Koran to match the temporal one?

Author: Trent Smith‎
Read More

MUHAMMAD'S IDEOLOGIES

Islam, Muhammad's Ideologies, Muslims plans, When Muhammad was weak, Jihad, Mohammad's jihad, Violence in Quran, Prophet Muhammad
THIS IS MUHAMMAD'S IDEOLOGIES AND SO AS ALL MUSLIMS PLANS AND IDEOLOGIES TO DOMINATE, share it on all platforms.

When Muhammad fled to the Non-Muslims territory (Medina) from his hometown in Mecca for being wanted for religious intolerance towards the indigenous Meccan pagans, he played the victim card that he was being targeted for persecution, the indigenous Jewish people of Medina accepted and sheltered him, he preached peace in the beginning and was accepted by the locals, but after he recruited an organized gangs of militias who are loyal to him, he plot conquest against the locals who sheltered him and eventually conquered them, kill their grown-up men, kidnapped their children, took their women as sex slaves, and turned the region what was then historical Jews, Christians and pagans Nations into what has become an Islamic Nations today.

1. When Muhammad was weak and are in minority, his message is the following:
A. “No compulsion in Religion - ''Quran 2:256.
B. “To you on your Religion and to me on mine - ''(Qur'an 109:1-6)

2. *When Muhammad became stronger and formed a gang of militias (Jihadist) the message become Convert, pay Jizya or Die:
A. “When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks.” Quran 47:4
B.“Muhammad is the apostle of Allah. Those who follow Him are merciful to one another but harsh and ruthless to the disbeliever.” 48:29
C. “Fight against those who do not obey Allah and do not believe in Allah or the Last Day and do not forbid what has been forbidden by Allah and His messenger even if they are of the People of the Book until they pay the Jizya with willing submission and feel themselves subdued.” Quran 9:29

Author: ‎Fogbonja Daramola
Read More

Friday, August 10, 2018

DIFFERENCES BETWEEN ISLAM AND BUDDHISM

Buddhism, Differences between Islam and Buddhism, Islam, Praying in public, Religion,
Someone posted the Buddhist picture yesterday. Great job.

For the Buddhist... I noticed the angle of the image...represents the mindset of the photographer and the posture in the image represents the mindset of the Buddhist.

This is what I noticed.

99.9% of Muslim men are photographed from behind. Buddhist men are not.

100% of Muslim men do not tuck in their rare end. Buddist men do.

There is no room between Muslims men bowing. There is an appropriate space between Buddhist men.

The position of Muslim men bowing to represent the character of Islam vs the character and integrity of Buddhist men.

Muslims men create prayer public scenes...Buddhist men do not.

Buddhist appear to be more focused on their purpose for bowing. Muslim seen fixated on glorifying the flesh.

You don't see a circus, onlookers, or sideline photographers staring at Buddhist. You see Muslims seeking and receiving public attention.

You don't see Buddhist posting images of a fake cartoon image of a man wearing a white rob bowing. Muslims do 100% of the time.

I've never read nor seen Buddhist stating they are following another god, people in the book, or book. Muslims do.

The posture of the Buddhist appears to be humble. The posture of Muslims men screams look at us.

Bowing is idol worship for sure. However, if I had to respect a people convinced and passionate about their belief it would be BUDDIST.

Certainly, I am praying Jesus Christ will draw Buddist. Until then I respect Buddist the person because they respect others. None are beheading, stoning, harming, hurting, nor killing anyone. And they aren't yelling a Buddhist phrase before committing a horrible crime.

Most of all when Buddhist come into my presence no demons surface. Unlike when Muslims come......

Author: Vasud Zoul

Admin's note:
I'm thinking you are the Buddist. Yes, you have some right points in this text, but all religions have the same points, they are cheating and lying to people. They are stealing the people's most important thing: the time!
Read More